KOGAION, AION and ION.Origin and linguistic relations.
They’re origin it is in the deepest time. From The Nostratic Macrofamily: A Study in Distant Linguistic Relationship https://books.google.ro/books?isbn=3110139006 Allan R. Bomhard, John C. Kerns
Sumerians used to associate an particle as an etiquette to gods and kings,
For gods at the begining there was written the sign DINGIR:”GOD” with the sign star *.
Linguists when read a text put at the begining of word the equivalent latin sign D.
For kings they usually associate an enhacement part to be understood sacred,god-like:
Lugal+ Name+ Kuga
man-great Name high,pure,sacred
Fundamentals of Sumerian Grammar / Grundzuge der Sumerischen Grammatik
https://books.google.ro/books?isbn=1597522988 –
Arno Poebel, K. C. Hanson ; kug-a „glänzend“, „rein“, „heilig“
For supposed name KOGAION wich seems an distorted new name, could be interpreted shortly
1.KUGA-ION :”Grandfather-Ion”because in Lycian Kuga is for grandfather.
You will ask: and what we have in common with Lycians?
*They say that the common origin of Romanians and Latin People it is in Lidia and Lycia.
Romans thought and were learned at school that they came from Lidia and theyr ancestor was Ludus.
Romanian knows that Dacians were related to wolf as theyr stindard/standard was.Lycos in greek is for wolf (thought as having sparkling,shining eyes in the night (gr.Lycos/shine,lat.it.Luce, light,rom.”a luci” to shine).
2.KUGAION, KUGA-AION, “temple,sacred aabode of Ion” because
MUSAION,or HERAION are MUSA+AION,HERA+AION fixed place,temple of MUSA(arts) or HERA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kogaionon Kogaionon was the holy mountain of the Geto-Dacians, the place where Zalmoxis stayed in an underground cave for three years. After his disappearance into Kogaionon, he was considered dead by the Getae but after three years he resurrected and showed himself to the people, who became convinced by his holy preaching when he emerged from Kogaionon.
Strabo claims that a river with the same name flowed in the vicinity.
One modern translation of Kogaionon is “sacred mountain”, which would be connected to a probable Dacian word kaga meaning “sacred”, attested in two early 2nd century inscriptions from Tomis.
ion,gr.”mooving”, aion:”fixed” aionon:”infinite time,eternal”
So Kogaionon it has twoo meanings at the same time:
koga-aionon :sacred-eternal and sacred-Ion’s temple or rather of God of infinite time,Aion.
In fact KOGAION it is not distorted because KOGA is a linguistics shift common in I.European languages and not only:
GOGA > KOGA.
Goga has the origin at king GUGU name known as Gyges.
GUG/GOG it is an I.European root wich signify “round,great,swelled,high”
Also has the meaning of ruller (IE root Ag) : DEMAGOGOS:DEMOS-AGOGOS:”ruller of people”.
Relative to Ion,was an ancestor of greek and latin people like Pelegus (“pelasgian”) but much older.
Because Ion is related to Oannes an this to Sky/God “AN” or chtonik En-Ki.
KUGA-ION is like KUGA-AN wich is wrong,not the case because KUGA-AN is sumerian equivalent of God Azag,an underground,death-land god of Death.Instead KUGA-an-na.
only 1 second:———————————————————————————————————
Not only have GODEANU mountain range (GUD-ANU,Gudanna?)
Encyclopedia of Beasts and Monsters in Myth, Legend and Folklore
https://books.google.ro/books?isbn=0786495057 Theresa Bane
Variations: BULL OF HEAVEN, Gugalana A monstrous bull from ancient Sumer, Gudanna (“an attacker”) was described as being gigantic and having breath so poisonous it could kill two hundred warriors at a time. …….
Gugalanna – Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gugalanna
In Sumerian religion, Gugalanna is the first husband of Ereshkigal, the queen of the Underworld.
——————————————————————————————————- Instead KUGA-AN-AN it is: “sacred,pure-god-sky”
An(En) + An = Lord,god+Sky —————————————
Nowdays asian people have kogea > trk Hogea rom.kogeamite :”somehow abnormal,exceseeve big”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khawaja
Khawaja or khwaja (Arabic: خواجة) is an honorific title used across the Middle East, South Asia, Southeast Asia and Central Asia, particularly towards Sufi teachers. The word comes from the Iranian word khwāja (New Persian: خواجه khāje; Dari khājah; Tajik khoja) and translates as “master”, “lord” or in archaic sense “gentleman”. The spellings hodja or hoca (Turkish), খাজা (Khaaja) (Bengali), hodža(Bosnian), hoxha (Albanian), hodža (Serbian), hotzakis (Greek), hogea (Romanian), koja (Javanese)[1] and al-khawaja[2] are also used. The name is also used in Egypt and Sudan to indicate a person with a foreign nationality or foreign heritage. Khawaja is also a surname amongst ethnic Kashmiris.
***************************************************************************
*Note
I want to make things and issues clear,so I don’t know (only have personal soughts and ideas):
1. what kind of people,genetics,from where came OLD EUROPE/Danubian/Vinca-Turdas culture people
2.When, and by wich route/way came “proper Ind-Europeans”
3.if lycians ,lidians were native Anatolians, relatives of Hittites,or distant-relative of Sumerians
4.if they migrated to Europe or there was early Danubian migrations to Anatolia (as Bruges>Phrigians supposed were)
5.How many main waves of supposed agriculturalist people from Sumer or Anatolia were and when
6.if relative small groups of sumerians or Anatolians come in Serbia and Dacia in search for metals; if they used as primary skill metal working not agricultural-one.
7. if Dacians were, and in what degree related to Lycians,Guttians(people from Zagros M.tains wich concured Sumer).
8.what was exactly relation of Danubians with Aegeans. ———————————————————————————————– From https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/Alexandru_I._Odobescu_-_Opere_alese._Volumul_2_-_Scrieri_istorice%2C_istorico-literare%2C_filologice%2C_folklorice%2C_arheologice%2C_etc..pdf < Radu cel frumos este, poate, Domnul care lasa inteinsa $i o tipsie de argint (de 29 centimetre in diametru), ce se pastreaza si pana azi, purtand pe cercul buzii, gravatd, Cu litere slavone mari si frumos taiate, urmätoarea in- scriptie :
mldia bjdeia lo Radul Voevoda i gn. vdsei zemli Un- grovlah,iskoi sn blcitvago i hrotliubivago lo Vlada Veli-kago Voevoda.
Adica :
t Cu mils. lui Dumnezeu, Io Radul Voevod si Domn al toatei Orel
Ungrovlahiei, fiul preacuviosului si de Hristos iubitorului Io Vlad
marele Voevod. >
Din κάγα: un important cuvânt dacic1 https://archive.is/y4i7N
Heroi sacrum
Ti(berius) Claudius Mu-
casius v(otum) s(olvit) l(ibens) m(erito)
Hερώϊι (sic!) ΚΑΤΑ Τι(βέριος)
Κλαύδιος Μου-
κάσιος εὐξάμ[ε-
νος καθιέρωσε[ν
Ofrandă lui Heros. Tiberius Claudius Mucasius şi-a îndeplinit juruinţa, cu dragă inimă şi pe bună dreptate “. Formula de încheiere, abrevierea V•S•L•M bine cunoscută epigrafiştilor, indică limpede o inscripţie votivă6. Iată însă ce spune acelaşi Tiberius Claudius, de data aceasta în greceşte: ” Lui Ērōs KATA. Tiberios Claudios Mukasios a consacrat (după cum) a promis “. Dacă, aşa cum am văzut, varianta latină este limpede, în cea greacă apare în schimb acest KATA, neexplicat satisfăcător de nici unul din editorii inscripţiei. Primul dintre ei, Gr. Tocilescu, încercând, la 1895, să-i dea totuşi un înţeles plauzibil, îl consideră pe KATA un adjectiv al lui Ērōi şi propune – de aceea – interpretarea lui drept o prescurtare a unui κατα(χθόνιος) “subpământean”, un epitet ori o ipostază a zeului. În lipsa unei alte explicaţii mai consistente propunerea a fost acceptată de toţi editorii ulteriori – şi admisă în literatura de specialitate. Ea are însă cel puţin două mari neajunsuri care atrag atenţia: 1. mai întâi ar presupune o diferenţă considerabilă între variantele latină şi greacă ale dedicaţiei, căci kata(chthōnios) “subpământean” lipseşte din textul latin, în timp ce acesta conţine pe sacrum “jertfă“, inexistent în versiunea greacă. 2. abrevierea kata pentru katachthōnios ar reprezenta un “dublu unicat”: pe de o parte ar fi singura oară când acest cuvânt s-ar prescurta astfel în inscripţiile greceşti, pe de alta acesta ar fi singurul loc în care zeul epihoric Hērōs ar fi numit “subpământean”. Toate aceste dificultăţi ar fi putut fi evitate dacă atât Tocilescu, cât mai ales editorii de mai târziu, ar fi privit cu mai multă atenţie piatra pe care, aşa cum se poate vedea în fig.1 şi 2, lapicidul a scris nu ΚΑΤΑ , ci ΚΑΓΑ !