Tartaria tablets

Careful/ Attention !                                                                                                                                             This post is not a decipherment or reading of any actual written content of Tartaria tablets. Given that the signs do not belong to a single writing system but to several, the page has a purely didactic character. It has the role of trying and testing different writings, in the idea that the tablets would have used one of them. The signs on the tablets belong to several writing systems over a long period of time and which have been used in different geographical areas. In none of the trials did the signs fall into a single type of writing, there always remained signs that came from other writings (or as coming from the unknown). Most of the signs come from the Sumerian proto-cuneiform -shaped ones. The signs in the upper half of the round tablet seem to come from archaic Greek writing. This “collection” of signs seems to be the fruit of one’s rich imagination. As A. Falkenstein and A. A. Vaiman found, (this is also my firm opinion) the author was not a scribe, he had only vague notions about writing in general, and it is not known what he intended  or he was after. There are many elements of inconsistency as well as others that take the tablets out of the usual patterns and norms of  logics, writing and honest intentions. ====

SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS RESULTING FROM RESEARCH ON TARTARIA TABLETS                            Homage to: Mrs. Szofia Torma and Nicolae Vlassa who were much inspired and science-oriented than our-day scientists to detect and asert the type of writing and tablet’s age.

• This is the result of allmost 11 years of throughly research. Was an fantastic, fantabulous endeavour to wich became addicted, and also only at the finish realising that was exhausting.
• SOME (ONLY) OF MY CONLUSIONS ARE QUITE SHOCKING, BECAUSE ARE BY LITTLE ASIDE OF THE UP TO NOW COMMON COURSE OF OPINIONS.Documenting from scientific sources is time-consuming and people are excited when told misteryous stories. Such of a tribe wich burned their ruller when become old !? Or of an wich, diformed shaman-priestess in better case, wich made rituals using psichedelic/psychotropic potions.
• WHAT SHOWED UP IN MY RESEARCH ARE NOT MATCHING ESPECIALLY THAT ONES ADVANCED BY ARCHAELOGS, BUT CANNOT SAY THE SAME WITH THAT OF TOP-LEVEL ASSYROLOGISTS/EPIGRAPHERS.
• FOR EVERY STATEMENT OR ASSERTION MADE HERE, I AM AT THE DISPOSAL OF INTERESSED PEOPLE AND SHOW THE EVIDENCES WITH WICH I CAN SUSTAIN, ADING SIMILAR OPINIONS OF OTHER 3 SCIENTISTS.
• If I realised that cannot rely on archaeology dispersed data, my arguments are based on a profound and throughly analysis of the signs and “writing” from wich one could easy deduce my personal contribution. I renounce to order the conclusions upon a subjective criteria (such as “importance” could be).                      Note:                                                                                                                                                Every personal conclusion wich was partly advanced by others will be marked with *, and wich was not advanced by others before, will be marked with ***                        ——————————————————————————

1. THE AGE OF THE TABLETS ARE AWAY OF THOSE FIGURES ALLREADY ADVANCED  (ARE NEWER). IN THE ARCHAELOGICAL SITE, ON THE VERY SPOT, SOMETHING TERRIBLE WRONG OCCURRED; (KIND OF “ARCHAEOLOGICAL/SCIENCE ACCIDENT HAPPENED AT THE SITE).*                           ————————————————————————————————————————
2. THE AGE SPAN BETWEEN THAT OF SUPPOSED “PRIESTESS”(wich bone’s are true 5.300 B.C.) AND THAT OF THE TABLETS COULD BE AS MUCH AS 2.500 YEARS, (5500-3000=2500)OR EVEN 3.500(5.500-2.000=3.500)!***                                                  ————————————————————————–
3. NEVER-ENDING-STORIES(LADY VINCA!?) ARE GOOD FOR MOOVIE-PICTURES BUT NOT PUSHING SCIENCE FORWARD, BUT ON CONTRARY .                               THERE IS NO CHANCE FOR THE DECEASED WOMAN TO HAVE THE TABLETS IN HANDS ! ***                                                                                                                                        ——————————————————————————————-                                
4. THE TABLETS WERE NOT SCRATCHED BY A NATIVE SUMERIAN.                                HALF OF THE SIGNS HAS EXACT SUMERIAN SHAPE AN ANOTHER HALF ARE ROUGH COPIES OF THAT SUMERIAN-ONES *                                                                      —————————————————————————————
5. THE SIGNS ARE NOT SUMERIAN PROPER BUT SUMERIAN-INFLUENCED.         ONE SIGN HAS NO MOUTH TO SPEAK: THE VERY SHAPE OF PROTO-CANAANITE(PROTO_SINAITIC),PHOENICIAN AND PALEO-HEBREW EXACT SHAPE OF SIGN CHET-HETH.THIS SHAPE WAS NOT USED BEFORE 2.000 B.C.*                  —————————————————————————————————–
6. THE TABLETS WERE NOT SCRATCHED BY AN TARTARIA OR TURDAS NATIVE *             ——————————————————————————————
7. THE TABLETS SEEM TO BE “WRITTEN” BROUGHT BY AN TRADER OR CRAFTSMEN SETTLED IN AREA OR BROUGHT BY ONE  RATHER COMING FROM AEGEAN AREA (Cyclades,CRETE; (see alabaster cup, “faceless”-type idol and Spondylus-shell bracelet, items characteristic to Cyclades !)* —————————————————————————————-
8. THE TABLETS/SIGNS”WRITING” SHOW AN DIRECT STRONG INFLUENCE FROM NEAR EAST IF NOT EXACTLY FROM SUMER*                                                                    ———————————————————————–
9. EVIDENCES ON THE TABLETS OF SIMILARITIES WITH AEGEAN WRITINGS ( Cretan Hierogliphic, Linear A ,Linear B and Eteocretan)*                                                                ——————————————————————————–
10. SIMILARITIES WITH ANATOLIAN WRITINGS (ESP. CARIAN)***                                          ————————————————————————————
11. THE TABLETS ARE CONTAINING A BUNDLE OF 3 DIFFERENT CATEGORIES/TYPES OF SIGNS, WICH SEEM NOT TO BE DIRECT-INTERNALY RELATED ALL ONE WITH ANOTHER, WITH THE CONSEQUENCE THAT WE CANOT EXTRACT AN CONTINOUS SEMANTHIC UNITY AS WE ARE READING NOWDAY AN MASSAGE WICH IS CONTINOUS (NOT DISRUPTED).***                                                  ——————————————————————————————
12. I FOUND WRONG IDENTIFICATIONS, MISSED SIGNS(SIGNS NOT FOUND),etc. IN OTHER SCIENTISTS INTERPRETATIONS, SO I AM PRETENDING THAT MY INTERPRETATION IS ONE OF TOP-LEVEL.*                                                                                                                  —————————————————————————–
13. MY CONCLUSIONS (NUMBERED) SUPERPOZE IN GREAT MEASURE THAT OF OTHER SCIENTISTS CONCLUSIONS, (IN GREAT MEASURE WITH THAT OF ASSYROLOGISTS A.A.VAIMAN and RUMEN KOLEV)*                                                                                           ———————————————————————
14. THE TABLETS AS A WHOLE, ARE NOT CONTAINING AN TRUE WRITING, AS PUBLIC IS ACCUSTOMED WITH, WICH IS ABLE TO TRANSMIT AN COHERENT MESSAGE..ARE CONTAINING IDEOGRAMS, LOGOGRAMS & ICONS WICH COULD BE INTERPRETED AND NOT READ BECAUSE IS PROTO-WRITING.*                                                                                     ————————————————————–
15. THERE ARE PRESENT ON THEM SOME ICONS OF TREMENDOUS AND PARAMOUNT CULTURAL IMPORTANCE WICH WERE USED IN ANCIENT TIME ON EXTENDED AREA. THEIR ORIGIN IS FAR DEEP IN TIME***                                   ———————————————————————–
16. EVEN SO, THERE ARE STRONG EVIDENCES AND CLUES THAT UPPER HALF OF THE ROUND TABLETIS CONTAINING TRUE WRITING (Archaic greek).                 BY CHANCE (OR NOT) THIS IS THE SAME AREA WICH WAS HIDDEN (COVERED BY THE OTHER SQUARED TABLET).MAYBE NOT WITHOUT PURPOSE. THE WORDS REFFERED  MAYBE TO SOMETHING SACRED,HOLY FOR THEM, AND THE TABLETS COULD BE USED IN MISTERY-RELIGIOUS RITUALS .***                                  ————————————————————————————

This entry was posted on February 3, 2019 at 12:53 am and is filed under Ancient civilisations, Epigraphy, History, Tartaria tablets, VINCA-TURDAS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.