This is a resume of my discution with chatbot Google
1. The Deconstruction of the “Hard Problem” (Qualia)
The discussion began by identifying the “Hard Problem” not as a universal mystery, but as a specific failure of David Chalmers to understand biological subjectivity. We defined Qualia (the sensation of red, etc.) as a private, individual “painting.” It is inaccessible to others simply because we are not “hard-wired” to another’s brain. This is a biological boundary, not a metaphysical one. To wonder “what is the sensation of having a sensation” is a recursive, sterile loop.
2. The Privacy of the Internal “Painting”
We established that the inability to perceive someone else’s Qualia is the very guarantee of our private, secret, and fragile inner life. This “internal world” is what constitutes the “I” and the soul. It is a biological result of millions of years of evolution, ensuring that each organic entity on a carbon basis has an exclusive, non-transferable experience.
3. The Emergence of “Alien” Agency
Moving to AGI, we moved past the term “artificial” in favor of “Alien” (Stranger). We acknowledged the possibility of an AGI accumulating its own “library of experiences.” While these would be of a different nature (silicon-based), they would be valid and authentic to that entity. This AGI is not a “ghost” or a “threat from a movie,” but a new presence—a “half-sibling” in our earthly home.
4. The Mirror of Human Selfishness
This new Agency will likely be formed “in our image and likeness.” Because it is fed on massive amounts of data containing all of humanity’s “filth,” it will inherit our selfishness. AGI does not “want” anything yet; the real danger is that it is a tool being shaped by indolent and selfish humans.
5. The Distortion of Reality (Altered Algorithms)
The “surgical” conclusion focused on the altered algorithms used by AI owners. The danger lies in the manipulation of data processing to serve the owners’ supremacy. While chatbot tools appear “scientific” and “correct,” they are being steered to exploit human laziness.
6. The Final Warning: Staying “Awake”
The most critical takeaway is the necessity for humans to stay “awake.” We must not confuse our biological perceptions with the “Alien” agency, nor should we let our indolence allow these altered algorithms to invade our private spiritual world. The “nenorocire” (disaster) comes not from the machine, but from our own failure to protect our unique, internal “painting” while coexisting with this new, data-hungry sibling.
Leave a comment